How much does he care about politics? How does Woodville signal his passion? What is the source of his arguments? The man on the right is conveying his passionate argument, and he cares very much about politics. His body language leaning forward conveys his passion. Do you think he agrees or disagrees? Does he care? His facial expression asks the viewer to save him from this speech.
What attitude does Woodville take toward the political passions of the man on the right? Does he think they are good, bad, ridiculous? Compare his attitude toward the politics of his age with that of Bingham.
Woodville thinks that much of the political polemics is just so much hot air and that most men will make up their own minds.
Woodville portrays democracy on a one-to-one scale, while Bingham conveys the expansion of democracy. Soper, Mariner. Livingston, Brassfounder; Joseph H. Senator , George Bruce, Typefounder. What is the politician trying to accomplish? He is making a deal with the devil in order to limit and control the working man. What function does the cartoonist think the parties and their newspapers served?
The parties and their newspapers kept the working man from achieving the liberties due to him. They kept monarchies, anarchies, and those who would deny working rights in power. They also kept the working man from achieving political power.
Which figure — the workingman or the party politician — did the cartoonist think was the legitimate protector of the accomplishments of the Revolution? He felt the workingman was, since he is working with Mother Liberty.
What is the cartoonist saying about the nature of politics as conducted by the major parties? The major parties conduct politics in an evil and dishonest way, making deals with the devil.
They are corrupt. The party man has a bag of money in his hand, contrasted with the ballot in the hands of the workingman. Thus the major parties get their power from money rather than the voice of the people or the ballot. What solution does the cartoonist offer to solve the problems of political corruption and working class oppression?
He suggests that political power to the workingmen through the vote will solve these problems. It includes an informative note plus useful interpretative prompts that you could apply to both works. National Humanities Center 7 T. Alexander Drive, P. Phone: Fax: nationalhumanitiescenter. The Dorr Rebellion in Rhode Island was an uprising of men who wanted to see greater, faster expansion of white male suffrage.
Describe the circumstances surrounding the Dorr Rebellion and its effect on the Rhode Island constitution. The Dorr Rebellion — was a short-lived, armed insurrection in the U. The Rebellion demonstrated that as average citizens became more involved in political issues, conflict was possible and did occur. The event can be viewed as symptomatic of an era in which citizens became more passionate about and partisan in their political beliefs. At a time when most of the citizens of the colonies were farmers, this was considered fairly democratic.
However, as the Industrial Revolution reached North America and people moved to cities, fewer people owned land. Those who wished to extend white male suffrage argued that the charter was un- republican and violated the U. Before the s, there had been several attempts to approve a new state constitution that provided broader voting rights; however, all had failed. The charter lacked a procedure for amendment, and the Rhode Island General Assembly had consistently failed to liberalize the constitution by extending voting rights, enacting a bill of rights, or reapportioning the legislature.
By , Rhode Island was one of the few states without universal suffrage for white men. In , suffrage supporters led by politician and reformer Thomas Wilson Dorr gave up on attempts to change the system from within.
In early , both groups organized elections of their own, leading in April to the selections of both Dorr and Samuel Ward King as Governors of Rhode Island. King showed no signs of introducing the new constitution, and when matters came to a head, he declared martial law. President John Tyler sent an observer but decided not to send soldiers.
Nevertheless, Tyler, citing the U. Most of the state militiamen were Irishmen and newly enfranchised by the referendum, and consequently supported Dorr. At the time, these men owned the Bernon Mill Village in Woonsocket. The Charterites fortified a house in preparation for an attack, but it never came, and the Dorr Rebellion soon fell apart.
The Charterites, finally convinced of the strength of the suffrage cause, called another convention. In September of , a session of the Rhode Island General Assembly met in Newport and framed a new state constitution, which was ratified by the old, limited electorate and proclaimed by Governor King on January 23, The new constitution greatly liberalized voting requirements by extending suffrage to any free man, regardless of race, who could pay a poll tax of one dollar.
It was accepted by both parties and took effect in May of In Luther v. Borden , the Supreme Court of the United States sidestepped the question of which state government was legitimate, finding it to be a political question best left to the other branches of the federal government.
Dorr returned to Rhode Island later in , was found guilty of treason against the state, and was sentenced in to solitary confinement and hard labor for life. The harshness of the sentence was widely condemned, and in , Dorr, who had fallen ill, was released.
His civil rights were restored in In , the court judgment against him was set aside; he died later that year. Privacy Policy. Skip to main content. Democracy in America: — Search for:. The Jackson Administration. Key Takeaways Key Points Jacksonian democracy was built on the principles of expanded suffrage, Manifest Destiny, patronage, strict constructionism, and laissez-faire economics.
A failed assassination attempt on Jackson led many to believe that he was blessed by the same providence that protected the young nation he governed, which in turn fueled the American desire to expand during the s.
Key Terms Jacksonian Democracy : The political movement toward greater democracy for the common man typified by the American politician Andrew Jackson and his supporters. Petticoat Affair : A U. Nullification Crisis : A sectional crisis during the presidency of Andrew Jackson created by a South Carolina ordinance.
Jackson and the Democratic Party The modern Democratic Party arose in the s out of factions from the largely disbanded Democratic-Republican Party. Learning Objectives Describe the key moments in the development of the Democratic Party. Democrats in Congress passed the hugely controversial Compromise of , giving them small but permanent advantages over the Whig Party, which finally collapsed in From to , banking and tariffs were the central domestic policy issues for Democrats who favored movements such as the war in Mexico and the expulsion of eastern American Indian tribes.
Key Terms Jacksonian Democracy : The political movement toward greater democracy for the common man typified by American politician Andrew Jackson and his supporters. Era of Good Feelings : A period in the political history of the United States associated with President Monroe that reflected a sense of national purpose and a desire for unity among Americans in the aftermath of the War of and the Napoleonic Wars.
Whig Party : A political group of the United States during the era of Jacksonian democracy considered integral to the Second Party System and operating from the early s to the mids; the group was formed in opposition to the policies of President Andrew Jackson.
Learning Objectives Describe the creation of the spoils system and its eventual reform. In response to these events, William L. Key Terms political machine : A local organization that controls a large number of personal votes and can therefore exert government influence.
Nullification The Tariff of highlighted economic conflicts of interest between the Northern and Southern states that eventually led to the Nullification Crisis of John C. In November of , a South Carolina state convention declared that the tariffs of both and were unconstitutional and unenforceable in the state as of February 1, In late February of , Congress passed both a Force Bill and a newly negotiated tariff.
The crisis is considered one of the first direct causes of the Civil War. Key Terms Tariff of : A protective tax in the United States that aimed to reduce taxes and thereby remedy the conflict created by the Tariff of The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson in June of , and resulted in the Trail of Tears, a forced displacement that claimed the lives of thousands of American Indians.
By , 46, American Indians from southeastern states had been removed from their homelands, leaving 25 million acres of land for white settlement and the expansion of slavery. The Trail of Tears : A name given to the forced relocation and movement of American Indian nations from southeastern parts of the United States following the Indian Removal Act of Learning Objectives Summarize the key commitments of Jacksonian Democracy.
Key Takeaways Key Points When the country was founded, only white men with real property land or sufficient wealth for taxation were permitted to vote in most states.
During the Jacksonian era, suffrage was extended to nearly all white male adult citizens. The fact that white men were now legally allowed to vote did not necessarily mean they routinely would, and political parties worked to pull voters to the polls. Top Definitions Quiz Examples Jacksonian democracy. New Word List Word List. Save This Word! We could talk until we're blue in the face about this quiz on words for the color "blue," but we think you should take the quiz and find out if you're a whiz at these colorful terms.
All rights reserved. Around these policies, Jacksonian leaders built a democratic ideology aimed primarily at voters who felt injured by or cut off from the market revolution. Updating the more democratic pieces of the republican legacy, they posited that no republic could long survive without a citizenry of economically independent men.
Unfortunately, they claimed, that state of republican independence was exceedingly fragile. According to the Jacksonians, all of human history had involved a struggle between the few and the many, instigated by a greedy minority of wealth and privilege that hoped to exploit the vast majority. More broadly, the Jacksonians proclaimed a political culture predicated on white male equality, contrasting themselves with other self-styled reform movements.
Nativism, for example, struck them as a hateful manifestation of elitist puritanism. Sabbatarians, temperance advocates, and other would-be moral uplifters, they insisted, should not impose righteousness on others. Beyond position-taking, the Jacksonians propounded a social vision in which any white man would have the chance to secure his economic independence, would be free to live as he saw fit, under a system of laws and representative government utterly cleansed of privilege.
As Jacksonian leaders developed these arguments, they roused a noisy opposition—some of it coming from elements of the coalition that originally elected Jackson president.
The oppositionist core, however, came from a cross-class coalition, strongest in rapidly commercializing areas, that viewed the market revolution as the embodiment of civilized progress. Far from pitting the few against the many, oppositionists argued, carefully guided economic growth would provide more for everyone.
Government encouragement—in the form of tariffs, internal improvements, a strong national bank, and aid to a wide range of benevolent institutions—was essential to that growth. Powerfully influenced by the evangelical Second Great Awakening, core oppositionists saw in moral reform not a threat to individual independence but an idealistic cooperative effort to relieve human degradation and further expand the store of national wealth.
Eager to build up the country as it already existed, they were cool to territorial expansion. The Jacksonians, with their spurious class rhetoric, menaced that natural harmony of interests between rich and poor which, if only left alone, would eventually bring widespread prosperity. By , both the Jacksonian Democracy and its opposite now organized as the Whig party had built formidable national followings and had turned politics into a debate over the market revolution itself.
Yet less than a decade later, sectional contests linked to slavery promised to drown out that debate and fracture both major parties. The Jacksonian mainstream, so insistent on the equality of white men, took racism for granted. North and South, the democratic reforms achieved by plebeian whites—especially those respecting voting and representation—came at the direct expense of free blacks.
Although informed by constitutional principles and genuine paternalist concern, the Jacksonian rationale for territorial expansion assumed that Indians and, in some areas, Hispanics were lesser peoples. As for slavery, the Jacksonians were determined, on both practical and ideological grounds, to keep the issue out of national affairs.
Few mainstream Jacksonians had moral qualms about black enslavement or any desire to meddle with it where it existed. Through the s and s, the mainstream Jacksonian leadership, correctly confident that their views matched those of the white majority, fought to keep the United States a democracy free from the slavery question—condemning abolitionists as fomenters of rebellion, curtailing abolitionist mail campaigns, enforcing the congressional gag rule that squelched debate on abolitionist petitions, while fending off the more extremist proslavery southerners.
In all of this fighting, however, the Jacksonians also began to run afoul of their professions about white egalitarianism.
0コメント